Luxembourg vs Sierra Leone: Enteric Fermentation — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) — UNFCCC
Enteric Fermentation — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) — UNFCCC over time
- Luxembourg
- Sierra Leone
How they compare
Luxembourg currently reports 450.65 kt against 401.26 kt in Sierra Leone, a difference of 49.39 kt.
That makes Luxembourg's figure about 1.1 times Sierra Leone's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Luxembourg ahead.
Luxembourg ranks 67th and Sierra Leone ranks 69th of 80 countries.
Luxembourg has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enteric fermentation — emissions (co2eq) (ar5) — unfccc, Luxembourg or Sierra Leone?
- Luxembourg, at 450.65 kt against 401.26 kt in Sierra Leone as of 2020.
- What is the difference in enteric fermentation — emissions (co2eq) (ar5) — unfccc between Luxembourg and Sierra Leone?
- 49.39 kt, with Luxembourg ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Luxembourg and Sierra Leone?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2005.
- How do Luxembourg and Sierra Leone rank globally for enteric fermentation — emissions (co2eq) (ar5) — unfccc?
- Luxembourg ranks 67th and Sierra Leone ranks 69th of 80 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Enteric Fermentation — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) — UNFCCC. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf