Djibouti vs Moldova: Farm gate — Emissions
Farm gate — Emissions over time
- Djibouti
- Moldova
How they compare
Moldova currently reports 19.33 kt against 19.09 kt in Djibouti, a difference of 0.24 kt.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Moldova has been ahead every year.
Djibouti ranks 163rd and Moldova ranks 161st of 256 countries.
Moldova has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Djibouti | Moldova | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 16.44 kt | 78.25 kt | 61.81 kt | Moldova |
| 2000s | 18.47 kt | 46.05 kt | 27.58 kt | Moldova |
| 2010s | 18.71 kt | 30.74 kt | 12.03 kt | Moldova |
| 2020s | 19.04 kt | 19.76 kt | 0.7189 kt | Moldova |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher farm gate — emissions, Djibouti or Moldova?
- Moldova, at 19.33 kt against 19.09 kt in Djibouti as of 2023.
- What is the difference in farm gate — emissions between Djibouti and Moldova?
- 0.24 kt, with Moldova ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Djibouti and Moldova?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Djibouti and Moldova rank globally for farm gate — emissions?
- Djibouti ranks 163rd and Moldova ranks 161st of 256 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Farm gate — Emissions (CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf