Montserrat vs Tokelau: Farm gate — Emissions
Farm gate — Emissions over time
- Montserrat
- Tokelau
How they compare
Tokelau currently reports 0.0352 kt against 0 kt in Montserrat, a difference of 0.0352 kt.
Across all 34 years both countries report, Tokelau has been ahead every year.
Montserrat ranks 194th and Tokelau ranks 188th of 221 countries.
Tokelau has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Montserrat | Tokelau | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0001 kt | 0.0152 kt | 0.0151 kt | Tokelau |
| 2000s | 0 kt | 0.0152 kt | 0.0152 kt | Tokelau |
| 2010s | 0.0004 kt | 0.0172 kt | 0.0167 kt | Tokelau |
| 2020s | 0 kt | 0.0428 kt | 0.0428 kt | Tokelau |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher farm gate — emissions, Montserrat or Tokelau?
- Tokelau, at 0.0352 kt against 0 kt in Montserrat as of 2023.
- What is the difference in farm gate — emissions between Montserrat and Tokelau?
- 0.0352 kt, with Tokelau ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Montserrat and Tokelau?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
- How do Montserrat and Tokelau rank globally for farm gate — emissions?
- Montserrat ranks 194th and Tokelau ranks 188th of 221 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Farm gate — Emissions (CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf