Congo vs Nepal: Farm gate — Emissions
Farm gate — Emissions over time
- Congo
- Nepal
How they compare
Congo currently reports 3,036 kt against 2,858 kt in Nepal, a difference of 178 kt.
That makes Congo's figure about 1.1 times Nepal's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Congo ahead.
Congo ranks 60th and Nepal ranks 62nd of 216 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 2 and Nepal in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Nepal | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 2,599 kt | 2,324 kt | 274.87 kt | Congo |
| 2000s | 2,431 kt | 2,682 kt | 251.06 kt | Nepal |
| 2010s | 2,802 kt | 2,867 kt | 65.62 kt | Nepal |
| 2020s | 3,002 kt | 2,962 kt | 40.29 kt | Congo |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher farm gate — emissions, Congo or Nepal?
- Congo, at 3,036 kt against 2,858 kt in Nepal as of 2023.
- What is the difference in farm gate — emissions between Congo and Nepal?
- 178 kt, with Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Nepal?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
- How do Congo and Nepal rank globally for farm gate — emissions?
- Congo ranks 60th and Nepal ranks 62nd of 216 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Farm gate — Emissions (CO2). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf