Iceland vs Libya: Farm gate — Emissions
Farm gate — Emissions over time
- Iceland
- Libya
How they compare
Iceland currently reports 1,304 kt against 1,301 kt in Libya, a difference of 3 kt.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Iceland ahead.
Iceland ranks 78th and Libya ranks 79th of 216 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Iceland averaged higher in 3 and Libya in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Iceland | Libya | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1,514 kt | 1,194 kt | 320.1 kt | Iceland |
| 2000s | 1,411 kt | 1,586 kt | 175.45 kt | Libya |
| 2010s | 1,321 kt | 1,205 kt | 115.82 kt | Iceland |
| 2020s | 1,303 kt | 1,290 kt | 13.23 kt | Iceland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher farm gate — emissions, Iceland or Libya?
- Iceland, at 1,304 kt against 1,301 kt in Libya as of 2023.
- What is the difference in farm gate — emissions between Iceland and Libya?
- 3 kt, with Iceland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Libya?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
- How do Iceland and Libya rank globally for farm gate — emissions?
- Iceland ranks 78th and Libya ranks 79th of 216 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Farm gate — Emissions (CO2). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf