Ecuador vs Laos: Farm gate — Emissions (CO2eq)
Farm gate — Emissions (CO2eq) over time
- Ecuador
- Laos
How they compare
Laos currently reports 12,480 kt against 12,252 kt in Ecuador, a difference of 228 kt.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Ecuador ahead.
Ecuador ranks 96th and Laos ranks 94th of 257 countries.
Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Laos | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 15,131 kt | 6,740 kt | 8,391 kt | Ecuador |
| 2000s | 15,654 kt | 7,907 kt | 7,746 kt | Ecuador |
| 2010s | 14,869 kt | 10,241 kt | 4,628 kt | Ecuador |
| 2020s | 13,238 kt | 11,638 kt | 1,599 kt | Ecuador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher farm gate — emissions (co2eq), Ecuador or Laos?
- Laos, at 12,480 kt against 12,252 kt in Ecuador as of 2023.
- What is the difference in farm gate — emissions (co2eq) between Ecuador and Laos?
- 228 kt, with Laos ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Laos?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
- How do Ecuador and Laos rank globally for farm gate — emissions (co2eq)?
- Ecuador ranks 96th and Laos ranks 94th of 257 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Farm gate — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf