Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) vs Sudan (former): Farm gate — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
320,315 kt
in 2023
Sudan (former)
39,196 kt
in 2011
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) rank
10th
Sudan (former) rank
13th

Farm gate — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O over time

  • Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
  • Sudan (former)
0100.0k200.0k300.0k199020062023

How they compare

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) currently reports 320,315 kt against 39,196 kt in Sudan (former), a difference of 281,119 kt.

That makes Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)'s figure about 8.2 times Sudan (former)'s.

Across all 22 years both countries report, Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) has been ahead every year.

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 10th and Sudan (former) ranks 13th of 32 groups.

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) Sudan (former) Difference Ahead
1990s 183,380 kt 31,612 kt 151,768 kt Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
2000s 222,916 kt 39,588 kt 183,329 kt Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
2010s 254,394 kt 39,183 kt 215,212 kt Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher farm gate — emissions (co2eq) from n2o, Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) or Sudan (former)?
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs), at 320,315 kt against 39,196 kt in Sudan (former) as of 2023.
What is the difference in farm gate — emissions (co2eq) from n2o between Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and Sudan (former)?
281,119 kt, with Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and Sudan (former)?
22 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2011.
How do Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and Sudan (former) rank globally for farm gate — emissions (co2eq) from n2o?
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 10th and Sudan (former) ranks 13th of 32 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Farm gate — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) vs Sudan (former): Farm gate — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/farm-gate-emissions-co2eq-from-n2o-ar5-fao-tier-1/low-income-food-deficit-countries-lifdcs/sudan-former/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/farm-gate-emissions-co2eq-from-n2o-ar5-fao-tier-1/low-income-food-deficit-countries-lifdcs/sudan-former/">Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) vs Sudan (former): Farm gate — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Farm gate — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
276 places, 9,163 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf