Congo vs Libya: Farm gate — Emissions
Farm gate — Emissions over time
- Congo
- Libya
How they compare
Congo currently reports 4.58 kt against 4.46 kt in Libya, a difference of 0.12 kt.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Congo ahead.
Congo ranks 127th and Libya ranks 128th of 239 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 3 and Libya in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Libya | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 3.17 kt | 3.28 kt | 0.1096 kt | Libya |
| 2000s | 3.88 kt | 3.7 kt | 0.1802 kt | Congo |
| 2010s | 5.23 kt | 4.48 kt | 0.7488 kt | Congo |
| 2020s | 4.86 kt | 4.39 kt | 0.4697 kt | Congo |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher farm gate — emissions, Congo or Libya?
- Congo, at 4.58 kt against 4.46 kt in Libya as of 2023.
- What is the difference in farm gate — emissions between Congo and Libya?
- 0.12 kt, with Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Libya?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
- How do Congo and Libya rank globally for farm gate — emissions?
- Congo ranks 127th and Libya ranks 128th of 239 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Farm gate — Emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf