Croatia vs Libya: Farm gate — Emissions
Farm gate — Emissions over time
- Croatia
- Libya
How they compare
Libya currently reports 4.46 kt against 4.11 kt in Croatia, a difference of 0.35 kt.
That makes Libya's figure about 1.1 times Croatia's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Croatia ahead.
Croatia ranks 120th and Libya ranks 117th of 222 countries.
Croatia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Croatia | Libya | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 5.13 kt | 3.23 kt | 1.9 kt | Croatia |
| 2000s | 5.87 kt | 3.7 kt | 2.17 kt | Croatia |
| 2010s | 4.56 kt | 4.48 kt | 0.0823 kt | Croatia |
| 2020s | 4.41 kt | 4.39 kt | 0.0285 kt | Croatia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher farm gate — emissions, Croatia or Libya?
- Libya, at 4.46 kt against 4.11 kt in Croatia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in farm gate — emissions between Croatia and Libya?
- 0.35 kt, with Libya ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and Libya?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Croatia and Libya rank globally for farm gate — emissions?
- Croatia ranks 120th and Libya ranks 117th of 222 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Farm gate — Emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf