Cuba vs Norway: Farm gate — Emissions
Farm gate — Emissions over time
- Cuba
- Norway
How they compare
Norway currently reports 9.74 kt against 8.6 kt in Cuba, a difference of 1.14 kt.
That makes Norway's figure about 1.1 times Cuba's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Cuba ahead.
Cuba ranks 98th and Norway ranks 96th of 222 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Cuba averaged higher in 3 and Norway in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cuba | Norway | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 13.35 kt | 10.13 kt | 3.21 kt | Cuba |
| 2000s | 10.48 kt | 9.99 kt | 0.4888 kt | Cuba |
| 2010s | 10.93 kt | 9.6 kt | 1.33 kt | Cuba |
| 2020s | 9.08 kt | 9.9 kt | 0.8152 kt | Norway |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher farm gate — emissions, Cuba or Norway?
- Norway, at 9.74 kt against 8.6 kt in Cuba as of 2023.
- What is the difference in farm gate — emissions between Cuba and Norway?
- 1.14 kt, with Norway ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Norway?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
- How do Cuba and Norway rank globally for farm gate — emissions?
- Cuba ranks 98th and Norway ranks 96th of 222 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Farm gate — Emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf