Ecuador vs Nicaragua: Farm gate — Emissions
Farm gate — Emissions over time
- Ecuador
- Nicaragua
How they compare
Nicaragua currently reports 11.94 kt against 11.45 kt in Ecuador, a difference of 0.49 kt.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Ecuador ahead.
Ecuador ranks 86th and Nicaragua ranks 84th of 222 countries.
Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Nicaragua | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 13.18 kt | 5.91 kt | 7.26 kt | Ecuador |
| 2000s | 14.59 kt | 7.45 kt | 7.14 kt | Ecuador |
| 2010s | 15.14 kt | 9.94 kt | 5.2 kt | Ecuador |
| 2020s | 13.62 kt | 11.35 kt | 2.27 kt | Ecuador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher farm gate — emissions, Ecuador or Nicaragua?
- Nicaragua, at 11.94 kt against 11.45 kt in Ecuador as of 2023.
- What is the difference in farm gate — emissions between Ecuador and Nicaragua?
- 0.49 kt, with Nicaragua ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Nicaragua?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
- How do Ecuador and Nicaragua rank globally for farm gate — emissions?
- Ecuador ranks 86th and Nicaragua ranks 84th of 222 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Farm gate — Emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf