Nepal vs Zimbabwe: Farm gate — Emissions
Farm gate — Emissions over time
- Nepal
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 17.16 kt against 16.66 kt in Nepal, a difference of 0.5 kt.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Zimbabwe ahead.
Nepal ranks 70th and Zimbabwe ranks 69th of 222 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Nepal averaged higher in 2 and Zimbabwe in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Nepal | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 12.15 kt | 16.71 kt | 4.56 kt | Zimbabwe |
| 2000s | 13.18 kt | 16.86 kt | 3.68 kt | Zimbabwe |
| 2010s | 17.7 kt | 16.46 kt | 1.24 kt | Nepal |
| 2020s | 19.27 kt | 16.48 kt | 2.8 kt | Nepal |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher farm gate — emissions, Nepal or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 17.16 kt against 16.66 kt in Nepal as of 2023.
- What is the difference in farm gate — emissions between Nepal and Zimbabwe?
- 0.5 kt, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Nepal and Zimbabwe?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
- How do Nepal and Zimbabwe rank globally for farm gate — emissions?
- Nepal ranks 70th and Zimbabwe ranks 69th of 222 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Farm gate — Emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf