Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) vs Uzbekistan: Food Packaging — Emissions (CO2eq)

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
1,474 kt
in 2023
Uzbekistan
914.84 kt
in 2023
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) rank
27th
Uzbekistan rank
26th

Food Packaging — Emissions (CO2eq) over time

  • Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
  • Uzbekistan
05001.0k1.5k199020062023

How they compare

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) currently reports 1,474 kt against 914.84 kt in Uzbekistan, a difference of 559.16 kt.

That makes Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)'s figure about 1.6 times Uzbekistan's.

Across all 32 years both countries report, Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) has been ahead every year.

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 27th and Uzbekistan ranks 26th of 31 groups.

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) Uzbekistan Difference Ahead
1990s 118.26 kt 1.32 kt 116.94 kt Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
2000s 152.91 kt 1.56 kt 151.35 kt Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
2010s 464.61 kt 171.15 kt 293.47 kt Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
2020s 1,393 kt 868.48 kt 524.73 kt Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher food packaging — emissions (co2eq), Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) or Uzbekistan?
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs), at 1,474 kt against 914.84 kt in Uzbekistan as of 2023.
What is the difference in food packaging — emissions (co2eq) between Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and Uzbekistan?
559.16 kt, with Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and Uzbekistan?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and Uzbekistan rank globally for food packaging — emissions (co2eq)?
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 27th and Uzbekistan ranks 26th of 31 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Food Packaging — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) vs Uzbekistan: Food Packaging — Emissions (CO2eq). Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/food-packaging-emissions-co2eq-ar5-fao-tier-1/low-income-food-deficit-countries-lifdcs/uzbekistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/food-packaging-emissions-co2eq-ar5-fao-tier-1/low-income-food-deficit-countries-lifdcs/uzbekistan/">Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) vs Uzbekistan: Food Packaging — Emissions (CO2eq)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Food Packaging — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
168 places, 5,582 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf