Jamaica vs Lithuania: Food Packaging — Emissions
Food Packaging — Emissions over time
- Jamaica
- Lithuania
How they compare
Jamaica currently reports 0.0001 kt against 0.0001 kt in Lithuania, a difference of 0 kt.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 16 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Lithuania ahead.
Jamaica ranks 85th and Lithuania ranks 85th of 120 countries.
Jamaica has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Jamaica | Lithuania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.0001 kt | 0.0001 kt | 0 kt | — |
| 2010s | 0.0001 kt | 0.0001 kt | 0 kt | — |
| 2020s | 0.0002 kt | 0.0001 kt | 0.0001 kt | Jamaica |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher food packaging — emissions, Jamaica or Lithuania?
- Jamaica, at 0.0001 kt against 0.0001 kt in Lithuania as of 2023.
- What is the difference in food packaging — emissions between Jamaica and Lithuania?
- 0 kt, with Jamaica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Jamaica and Lithuania?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2023.
- How do Jamaica and Lithuania rank globally for food packaging — emissions?
- Jamaica ranks 85th and Lithuania ranks 85th of 120 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Food Packaging — Emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf