Australia and New Zealand vs India: Food Packaging — Energy Use

Australia and New Zealand
15,452 TJ
in 2023
India
20,234 TJ
in 2016
Australia and New Zealand rank
11th
India rank
9th

Food Packaging — Energy Use over time

  • Australia and New Zealand
  • India
020.0k40.0k60.0k199020062023

How they compare

India currently reports 20,234 TJ against 15,452 TJ in Australia and New Zealand, a difference of 4,782 TJ.

That makes India's figure about 1.3 times Australia and New Zealand's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 27 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Australia and New Zealand ahead.

Australia and New Zealand ranks 11th and India ranks 9th of 95 countries.

Australia and New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia and New Zealand India Difference Ahead
1990s 25,162 TJ 469.84 TJ 24,693 TJ Australia and New Zealand
2000s 32,259 TJ 1,549 TJ 30,710 TJ Australia and New Zealand
2010s 24,211 TJ 12,071 TJ 12,140 TJ Australia and New Zealand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher food packaging — energy use, Australia and New Zealand or India?
India, at 20,234 TJ against 15,452 TJ in Australia and New Zealand as of 2016.
What is the difference in food packaging — energy use between Australia and New Zealand and India?
4,782 TJ, with India ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and India?
27 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2016.
How do Australia and New Zealand and India rank globally for food packaging — energy use?
Australia and New Zealand ranks 11th and India ranks 9th of 95 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Food Packaging — Energy Use (Electricity). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia and New Zealand vs India: Food Packaging — Energy Use. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 08 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/food-packaging-energy-use-electricity/australia-and-new-zealand/india/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/food-packaging-energy-use-electricity/australia-and-new-zealand/india/">Australia and New Zealand vs India: Food Packaging — Energy Use</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Food Packaging — Energy Use (Electricity)
Unit
TJ
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
135 places, 3,946 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Pre- and post- agricultural production includes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, and related activity data, generated from pre- and post-agriculture production stages of the agri-food systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). The domain includes methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O), carbon dioxide (CO2) and CO2 equivalent (CO2eq) emissions from the above activities as well as the aggregate fluorinated gases (F-gases) emissions. Estimates are available by country, with global coverage and are updated annually.The FAOSTAT domain disseminates information estimates of CH4, N2O, CO2 emissions, F-gases, their aggregates in CO2eq in units of kilotonnes (kt, or 10^6 kg), and the underlying activity data. CO2eq emissions are computed by using the IPCC Fifth Assessment report global warming potentials, AR5 (IPCC, 2014). Data are available for most countries and territories, for standard FAOSTAT regional aggregations, and for Annex I and non-Annex I country groups.