Botswana vs Montenegro: Food Packaging — Energy Use

Botswana
24.56 TJ
in 2023
Montenegro
22.5 TJ
in 2023
Botswana rank
92nd
Montenegro rank
93rd

Food Packaging — Energy Use over time

  • Botswana
  • Montenegro
02004006008001.0k200620142023

How they compare

Botswana currently reports 24.56 TJ against 22.5 TJ in Montenegro, a difference of 2.06 TJ.

That makes Botswana's figure about 1.1 times Montenegro's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Montenegro ahead.

Botswana ranks 92nd and Montenegro ranks 93rd of 100 countries.

Montenegro has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Botswana Montenegro Difference Ahead
2010s 24.85 TJ 225.13 TJ 200.28 TJ Montenegro
2020s 24.06 TJ 121.19 TJ 97.13 TJ Montenegro

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher food packaging — energy use, Botswana or Montenegro?
Botswana, at 24.56 TJ against 22.5 TJ in Montenegro as of 2023.
What is the difference in food packaging — energy use between Botswana and Montenegro?
2.06 TJ, with Botswana ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Montenegro?
10 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2023.
How do Botswana and Montenegro rank globally for food packaging — energy use?
Botswana ranks 92nd and Montenegro ranks 93rd of 100 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Food Packaging — Energy Use (Electricity). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Botswana vs Montenegro: Food Packaging — Energy Use. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 16 August 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/food-packaging-energy-use-electricity/botswana/montenegro/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/food-packaging-energy-use-electricity/botswana/montenegro/">Botswana vs Montenegro: Food Packaging — Energy Use</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Food Packaging — Energy Use (Electricity)
Unit
TJ
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
135 places, 3,946 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Pre- and post- agricultural production includes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, and related activity data, generated from pre- and post-agriculture production stages of the agri-food systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). The domain includes methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O), carbon dioxide (CO2) and CO2 equivalent (CO2eq) emissions from the above activities as well as the aggregate fluorinated gases (F-gases) emissions. Estimates are available by country, with global coverage and are updated annually.The FAOSTAT domain disseminates information estimates of CH4, N2O, CO2 emissions, F-gases, their aggregates in CO2eq in units of kilotonnes (kt, or 10^6 kg), and the underlying activity data. CO2eq emissions are computed by using the IPCC Fifth Assessment report global warming potentials, AR5 (IPCC, 2014). Data are available for most countries and territories, for standard FAOSTAT regional aggregations, and for Annex I and non-Annex I country groups.