Albania vs Uruguay: Food Processing — Emissions
Food Processing — Emissions over time
- Albania
- Uruguay
How they compare
Uruguay currently reports 0.0074 kt against 0.0067 kt in Albania, a difference of 0.0007 kt.
That makes Uruguay's figure about 1.1 times Albania's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Albania ahead.
Albania ranks 81st and Uruguay ranks 79th of 112 countries.
Albania has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Albania | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.0059 kt | 0.0033 kt | 0.0026 kt | Albania |
| 2020s | 0.0076 kt | 0.0074 kt | 0.0002 kt | Albania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher food processing — emissions, Albania or Uruguay?
- Uruguay, at 0.0074 kt against 0.0067 kt in Albania as of 2023.
- What is the difference in food processing — emissions between Albania and Uruguay?
- 0.0007 kt, with Uruguay ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Albania and Uruguay?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2023.
- How do Albania and Uruguay rank globally for food processing — emissions?
- Albania ranks 81st and Uruguay ranks 79th of 112 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Food Processing — Emissions (CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf