Australia and New Zealand vs Democratic Republic of the Congo: Food Processing — Emissions

Australia and New Zealand
3.26 kt
in 2023
Democratic Republic of the Congo
0.001 kt
in 2023
Australia and New Zealand rank
8th
Democratic Republic of the Congo rank
9th

Food Processing — Emissions over time

  • Australia and New Zealand
  • Democratic Republic of the Congo
01234199020062023

How they compare

Australia and New Zealand currently reports 3.26 kt against 0.001 kt in Democratic Republic of the Congo, a difference of 3.26 kt.

That makes Australia and New Zealand's figure about 3,257.3 times Democratic Republic of the Congo's.

Across all 8 years both countries report, Australia and New Zealand has been ahead every year.

Australia and New Zealand ranks 8th and Democratic Republic of the Congo ranks 9th of 98 countries.

Australia and New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia and New Zealand Democratic Republic of the Congo Difference Ahead
2010s 3.46 kt 0.0004 kt 3.46 kt Australia and New Zealand
2020s 3.34 kt 0.0009 kt 3.34 kt Australia and New Zealand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher food processing — emissions, Australia and New Zealand or Democratic Republic of the Congo?
Australia and New Zealand, at 3.26 kt against 0.001 kt in Democratic Republic of the Congo as of 2023.
What is the difference in food processing — emissions between Australia and New Zealand and Democratic Republic of the Congo?
3.26 kt, with Australia and New Zealand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and Democratic Republic of the Congo?
8 years are reported by both, from 2016 to 2023.
How do Australia and New Zealand and Democratic Republic of the Congo rank globally for food processing — emissions?
Australia and New Zealand ranks 8th and Democratic Republic of the Congo ranks 9th of 98 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Food Processing — Emissions (CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia and New Zealand vs Democratic Republic of the Congo: Food Processing — Emissions. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/food-processing-emissions-ch4-fao-tier-1/australia-and-new-zealand/democratic-republic-of-the-congo/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/food-processing-emissions-ch4-fao-tier-1/australia-and-new-zealand/democratic-republic-of-the-congo/">Australia and New Zealand vs Democratic Republic of the Congo: Food Processing — Emissions</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Food Processing — Emissions (CH4)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
138 places, 3,653 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf