Congo vs Mozambique: Food Processing — Emissions
Food Processing — Emissions over time
- Congo
- Mozambique
How they compare
Congo currently reports 0.0022 kt against 0.0016 kt in Mozambique, a difference of 0.0006 kt.
That makes Congo's figure about 1.4 times Mozambique's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Congo ahead.
Congo ranks 87th and Mozambique ranks 90th of 103 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 1 and Mozambique in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Mozambique | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.0026 kt | 0.0006 kt | 0.0019 kt | Congo |
| 2020s | 0.0022 kt | 0.0026 kt | 0.0004 kt | Mozambique |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher food processing — emissions, Congo or Mozambique?
- Congo, at 0.0022 kt against 0.0016 kt in Mozambique as of 2023.
- What is the difference in food processing — emissions between Congo and Mozambique?
- 0.0006 kt, with Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Mozambique?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.
- How do Congo and Mozambique rank globally for food processing — emissions?
- Congo ranks 87th and Mozambique ranks 90th of 103 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Food Processing — Emissions (CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf