Lesotho vs Seychelles: Food Processing — Emissions
Food Processing — Emissions over time
- Lesotho
- Seychelles
How they compare
Lesotho currently reports 0.0002 kt against 0.0001 kt in Seychelles, a difference of 0.0001 kt.
That makes Lesotho's figure about 2.0 times Seychelles's.
Across all 7 years both countries report, Lesotho has been ahead every year.
Lesotho ranks 100th and Seychelles ranks 102nd of 103 countries.
Lesotho has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lesotho | Seychelles | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.0003 kt | 0.0001 kt | 0.0002 kt | Lesotho |
| 2020s | 0.0002 kt | 0.0001 kt | 0.0001 kt | Lesotho |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher food processing — emissions, Lesotho or Seychelles?
- Lesotho, at 0.0002 kt against 0.0001 kt in Seychelles as of 2023.
- What is the difference in food processing — emissions between Lesotho and Seychelles?
- 0.0001 kt, with Lesotho ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lesotho and Seychelles?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2017 to 2023.
- How do Lesotho and Seychelles rank globally for food processing — emissions?
- Lesotho ranks 100th and Seychelles ranks 102nd of 103 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Food Processing — Emissions (CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf