Malawi vs Serbia: Food Processing — Emissions
Food Processing — Emissions over time
- Malawi
- Serbia
How they compare
Serbia currently reports 0.1285 kt against 0.1263 kt in Malawi, a difference of 0.0022 kt.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 16 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Malawi ahead.
Malawi ranks 40th and Serbia ranks 39th of 112 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Malawi averaged higher in 1 and Serbia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malawi | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.0739 kt | 0.0595 kt | 0.0144 kt | Malawi |
| 2010s | 0.0952 kt | 0.1236 kt | 0.0284 kt | Serbia |
| 2020s | 0.1287 kt | 0.1385 kt | 0.0099 kt | Serbia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher food processing — emissions, Malawi or Serbia?
- Serbia, at 0.1285 kt against 0.1263 kt in Malawi as of 2023.
- What is the difference in food processing — emissions between Malawi and Serbia?
- 0.0022 kt, with Serbia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malawi and Serbia?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2023.
- How do Malawi and Serbia rank globally for food processing — emissions?
- Malawi ranks 40th and Serbia ranks 39th of 112 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Food Processing — Emissions (CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf