Myanmar vs Uruguay: Food Processing — Emissions
Food Processing — Emissions over time
- Myanmar
- Uruguay
How they compare
Myanmar currently reports 0.008 kt against 0.0074 kt in Uruguay, a difference of 0.0006 kt.
That makes Myanmar's figure about 1.1 times Uruguay's.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Myanmar has been ahead every year.
Myanmar ranks 77th and Uruguay ranks 79th of 112 countries.
Myanmar has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Myanmar | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.0119 kt | 0.0033 kt | 0.0086 kt | Myanmar |
| 2020s | 0.009 kt | 0.0074 kt | 0.0016 kt | Myanmar |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher food processing — emissions, Myanmar or Uruguay?
- Myanmar, at 0.008 kt against 0.0074 kt in Uruguay as of 2023.
- What is the difference in food processing — emissions between Myanmar and Uruguay?
- 0.0006 kt, with Myanmar ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Myanmar and Uruguay?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2023.
- How do Myanmar and Uruguay rank globally for food processing — emissions?
- Myanmar ranks 77th and Uruguay ranks 79th of 112 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Food Processing — Emissions (CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf