Congo vs Luxembourg: Food Processing — Emissions
Food Processing — Emissions over time
- Congo
- Luxembourg
How they compare
Congo currently reports 53.59 kt against 43.61 kt in Luxembourg, a difference of 9.98 kt.
That makes Congo's figure about 1.2 times Luxembourg's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Luxembourg ahead.
Congo ranks 85th and Luxembourg ranks 88th of 103 countries.
Congo has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Luxembourg | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 64.2 kt | 59.56 kt | 4.64 kt | Congo |
| 2020s | 52.99 kt | 44.73 kt | 8.27 kt | Congo |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher food processing — emissions, Congo or Luxembourg?
- Congo, at 53.59 kt against 43.61 kt in Luxembourg as of 2023.
- What is the difference in food processing — emissions between Congo and Luxembourg?
- 9.98 kt, with Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Luxembourg?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.
- How do Congo and Luxembourg rank globally for food processing — emissions?
- Congo ranks 85th and Luxembourg ranks 88th of 103 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Food Processing — Emissions (CO2). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf