Finland vs Malawi: Food Processing — Emissions
Food Processing — Emissions over time
- Finland
- Malawi
How they compare
Malawi currently reports 518.12 kt against 506.69 kt in Finland, a difference of 11.43 kt.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 16 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Finland ahead.
Finland ranks 51st and Malawi ranks 50th of 98 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Finland averaged higher in 2 and Malawi in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Finland | Malawi | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 812.04 kt | 276.02 kt | 536.01 kt | Finland |
| 2010s | 762.05 kt | 382.02 kt | 380.03 kt | Finland |
| 2020s | 524.84 kt | 530.64 kt | 5.79 kt | Malawi |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher food processing — emissions, Finland or Malawi?
- Malawi, at 518.12 kt against 506.69 kt in Finland as of 2023.
- What is the difference in food processing — emissions between Finland and Malawi?
- 11.43 kt, with Malawi ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Finland and Malawi?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2023.
- How do Finland and Malawi rank globally for food processing — emissions?
- Finland ranks 51st and Malawi ranks 50th of 98 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Food Processing — Emissions (CO2). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf