Ukraine vs Zimbabwe: Food Processing — Emissions
Food Processing — Emissions over time
- Ukraine
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 2,959 kt against 2,879 kt in Ukraine, a difference of 80 kt.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 16 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Zimbabwe ahead.
Ukraine ranks 26th and Zimbabwe ranks 24th of 98 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Ukraine averaged higher in 2 and Zimbabwe in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ukraine | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 132.94 kt | 312.25 kt | 179.32 kt | Zimbabwe |
| 2010s | 2,960 kt | 505.02 kt | 2,455 kt | Ukraine |
| 2020s | 3,640 kt | 1,751 kt | 1,889 kt | Ukraine |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher food processing — emissions, Ukraine or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 2,959 kt against 2,879 kt in Ukraine as of 2023.
- What is the difference in food processing — emissions between Ukraine and Zimbabwe?
- 80 kt, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ukraine and Zimbabwe?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2023.
- How do Ukraine and Zimbabwe rank globally for food processing — emissions?
- Ukraine ranks 26th and Zimbabwe ranks 24th of 98 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Food Processing — Emissions (CO2). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf