Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) vs Zimbabwe: Food Processing — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
27.24 kt
in 2023
Zimbabwe
9.42 kt
in 2023
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) rank
10th
Zimbabwe rank
22nd

Food Processing — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O over time

  • Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
  • Zimbabwe
0102030199020062023

How they compare

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) currently reports 27.24 kt against 9.42 kt in Zimbabwe, a difference of 17.82 kt.

That makes Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)'s figure about 2.9 times Zimbabwe's.

Across all 20 years both countries report, Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) has been ahead every year.

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 10th and Zimbabwe ranks 22nd of 12 groups.

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
2000s 7.25 kt 0.6488 kt 6.6 kt Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
2010s 15.45 kt 1.59 kt 13.86 kt Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
2020s 23.67 kt 5.57 kt 18.1 kt Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher food processing — emissions (co2eq) from n2o, Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) or Zimbabwe?
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs), at 27.24 kt against 9.42 kt in Zimbabwe as of 2023.
What is the difference in food processing — emissions (co2eq) from n2o between Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and Zimbabwe?
17.82 kt, with Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and Zimbabwe?
20 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2023.
How do Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and Zimbabwe rank globally for food processing — emissions (co2eq) from n2o?
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 10th and Zimbabwe ranks 22nd of 12 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Food Processing — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) vs Zimbabwe: Food Processing — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 20 August 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/food-processing-emissions-co2eq-from-n2o-ar5-fao-tier-1/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/food-processing-emissions-co2eq-from-n2o-ar5-fao-tier-1/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/zimbabwe/">Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) vs Zimbabwe: Food Processing — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Food Processing — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
138 places, 3,653 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf