Sub-Saharan Africa vs Switzerland: Food Processing — Energy Use

Sub-Saharan Africa
14,326 TJ
in 2023
Switzerland
9,403 TJ
in 2023
Sub-Saharan Africa rank
24th
Switzerland rank
27th

Food Processing — Energy Use over time

  • Sub-Saharan Africa
  • Switzerland
05.0k10.0k15.0k199020062023

How they compare

Sub-Saharan Africa currently reports 14,326 TJ against 9,403 TJ in Switzerland, a difference of 4,923 TJ.

That makes Sub-Saharan Africa's figure about 1.5 times Switzerland's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 30 shared years of data; in 1994 it was Switzerland ahead.

Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 24th and Switzerland ranks 27th of 31 groups.

Across the 4 decades both report, Sub-Saharan Africa averaged higher in 2 and Switzerland in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Sub-Saharan Africa Switzerland Difference Ahead
1990s 247.2 TJ 2,373 TJ 2,126 TJ Switzerland
2000s 2,730 TJ 6,720 TJ 3,990 TJ Switzerland
2010s 9,885 TJ 8,982 TJ 902.93 TJ Sub-Saharan Africa
2020s 14,516 TJ 9,450 TJ 5,066 TJ Sub-Saharan Africa

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher food processing — energy use, Sub-Saharan Africa or Switzerland?
Sub-Saharan Africa, at 14,326 TJ against 9,403 TJ in Switzerland as of 2023.
What is the difference in food processing — energy use between Sub-Saharan Africa and Switzerland?
4,923 TJ, with Sub-Saharan Africa ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Sub-Saharan Africa and Switzerland?
30 years are reported by both, from 1994 to 2023.
How do Sub-Saharan Africa and Switzerland rank globally for food processing — energy use?
Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 24th and Switzerland ranks 27th of 31 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Food Processing — Energy Use (Electricity). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Sub-Saharan Africa vs Switzerland: Food Processing — Energy Use. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 27 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/food-processing-energy-use-electricity/sub-saharan-africa/switzerland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/food-processing-energy-use-electricity/sub-saharan-africa/switzerland/">Sub-Saharan Africa vs Switzerland: Food Processing — Energy Use</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Food Processing — Energy Use (Electricity)
Unit
TJ
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
122 places, 3,125 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Pre- and post- agricultural production includes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, and related activity data, generated from pre- and post-agriculture production stages of the agri-food systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). The domain includes methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O), carbon dioxide (CO2) and CO2 equivalent (CO2eq) emissions from the above activities as well as the aggregate fluorinated gases (F-gases) emissions. Estimates are available by country, with global coverage and are updated annually.The FAOSTAT domain disseminates information estimates of CH4, N2O, CO2 emissions, F-gases, their aggregates in CO2eq in units of kilotonnes (kt, or 10^6 kg), and the underlying activity data. CO2eq emissions are computed by using the IPCC Fifth Assessment report global warming potentials, AR5 (IPCC, 2014). Data are available for most countries and territories, for standard FAOSTAT regional aggregations, and for Annex I and non-Annex I country groups.