Austria vs Netherlands (Kingdom of the): Food Processing — Energy Use

Austria
1,409 TJ
in 2023
Netherlands (Kingdom of the)
1,153 TJ
in 2023
Austria rank
15th
Netherlands (Kingdom of the) rank
18th

Food Processing — Energy Use over time

  • Austria
  • Netherlands (Kingdom of the)
02.0k4.0k6.0k8.0k199020062023

How they compare

Austria currently reports 1,409 TJ against 1,153 TJ in Netherlands (Kingdom of the), a difference of 256 TJ.

That makes Austria's figure about 1.2 times Netherlands (Kingdom of the)'s.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Netherlands (Kingdom of the) ahead.

Austria ranks 15th and Netherlands (Kingdom of the) ranks 18th of 37 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Austria averaged higher in 1 and Netherlands (Kingdom of the) in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Austria Netherlands (Kingdom of the) Difference Ahead
1990s 763.5 TJ 3,640 TJ 2,877 TJ Netherlands (Kingdom of the)
2000s 672.7 TJ 6,514 TJ 5,841 TJ Netherlands (Kingdom of the)
2010s 1,279 TJ 3,772 TJ 2,493 TJ Netherlands (Kingdom of the)
2020s 1,384 TJ 1,013 TJ 370.26 TJ Austria

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher food processing — energy use, Austria or Netherlands (Kingdom of the)?
Austria, at 1,409 TJ against 1,153 TJ in Netherlands (Kingdom of the) as of 2023.
What is the difference in food processing — energy use between Austria and Netherlands (Kingdom of the)?
256 TJ, with Austria ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Austria and Netherlands (Kingdom of the)?
34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do Austria and Netherlands (Kingdom of the) rank globally for food processing — energy use?
Austria ranks 15th and Netherlands (Kingdom of the) ranks 18th of 37 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Food Processing — Energy Use (Heat). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Austria vs Netherlands (Kingdom of the): Food Processing — Energy Use. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 27 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/food-processing-energy-use-heat/austria/netherlands-kingdom-of-the/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/food-processing-energy-use-heat/austria/netherlands-kingdom-of-the/">Austria vs Netherlands (Kingdom of the): Food Processing — Energy Use</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Food Processing — Energy Use (Heat)
Unit
TJ
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
55 places, 1,461 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Pre- and post- agricultural production includes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, and related activity data, generated from pre- and post-agriculture production stages of the agri-food systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). The domain includes methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O), carbon dioxide (CO2) and CO2 equivalent (CO2eq) emissions from the above activities as well as the aggregate fluorinated gases (F-gases) emissions. Estimates are available by country, with global coverage and are updated annually.The FAOSTAT domain disseminates information estimates of CH4, N2O, CO2 emissions, F-gases, their aggregates in CO2eq in units of kilotonnes (kt, or 10^6 kg), and the underlying activity data. CO2eq emissions are computed by using the IPCC Fifth Assessment report global warming potentials, AR5 (IPCC, 2014). Data are available for most countries and territories, for standard FAOSTAT regional aggregations, and for Annex I and non-Annex I country groups.