Namibia vs Norway: Food Retail — Emissions
Food Retail — Emissions over time
- Namibia
- Norway
How they compare
Norway currently reports 155.82 kt against 144.2 kt in Namibia, a difference of 11.62 kt.
That makes Norway's figure about 1.1 times Namibia's.
Across all 24 years both countries report, Norway has been ahead every year.
Namibia ranks 107th and Norway ranks 105th of 190 countries.
Norway has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Namibia | Norway | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2.62 kt | 119.38 kt | 116.76 kt | Norway |
| 2010s | 71.66 kt | 165.11 kt | 93.45 kt | Norway |
| 2020s | 138.42 kt | 158.1 kt | 19.68 kt | Norway |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher food retail — emissions, Namibia or Norway?
- Norway, at 155.82 kt against 144.2 kt in Namibia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in food retail — emissions between Namibia and Norway?
- 11.62 kt, with Norway ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Namibia and Norway?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Namibia and Norway rank globally for food retail — emissions?
- Namibia ranks 107th and Norway ranks 105th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Food Retail — Emissions (CO2). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf