South Sudan vs East Timor: Food Retail — Emissions
Food Retail — Emissions over time
- South Sudan
- East Timor
How they compare
East Timor currently reports 8.42 kt against 8.2 kt in South Sudan, a difference of 0.22 kt.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 12 shared years of data; in 2012 it was South Sudan ahead.
South Sudan ranks 190th and East Timor ranks 188th of 222 countries.
South Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | South Sudan | East Timor | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 20.36 kt | 5.14 kt | 15.22 kt | South Sudan |
| 2020s | 8.11 kt | 7.81 kt | 0.2968 kt | South Sudan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher food retail — emissions, South Sudan or East Timor?
- East Timor, at 8.42 kt against 8.2 kt in South Sudan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in food retail — emissions between South Sudan and East Timor?
- 0.22 kt, with East Timor ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for South Sudan and East Timor?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.
- How do South Sudan and East Timor rank globally for food retail — emissions?
- South Sudan ranks 190th and East Timor ranks 188th of 222 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Food Retail — Emissions (CO2). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf