Monaco vs Nauru: Food Retail — Emissions (CO2eq)
Food Retail — Emissions (CO2eq) over time
- Monaco
- Nauru
How they compare
Monaco currently reports 1.98 kt against 1.33 kt in Nauru, a difference of 0.65 kt.
That makes Monaco's figure about 1.5 times Nauru's.
Across all 17 years both countries report, Monaco has been ahead every year.
Monaco ranks 227th and Nauru ranks 229th of 235 countries.
Monaco has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Monaco | Nauru | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2.42 kt | 1.19 kt | 1.23 kt | Monaco |
| 2010s | 2.52 kt | 0.8853 kt | 1.63 kt | Monaco |
| 2020s | 1.99 kt | 1.32 kt | 0.679 kt | Monaco |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher food retail — emissions (co2eq), Monaco or Nauru?
- Monaco, at 1.98 kt against 1.33 kt in Nauru as of 2023.
- What is the difference in food retail — emissions (co2eq) between Monaco and Nauru?
- 0.65 kt, with Monaco ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Monaco and Nauru?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2023.
- How do Monaco and Nauru rank globally for food retail — emissions (co2eq)?
- Monaco ranks 227th and Nauru ranks 229th of 235 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Food Retail — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf