Europe vs United Republic of Tanzania: Food Retail — Emissions (CO2eq)

Europe
100,310 kt
in 2023
United Republic of Tanzania
8,051 kt
in 2023
Europe rank
7th
United Republic of Tanzania rank
6th

Food Retail — Emissions (CO2eq) over time

  • Europe
  • United Republic of Tanzania
025.0k50.0k75.0k100.0k125.0k199020062023

How they compare

Europe currently reports 100,310 kt against 8,051 kt in United Republic of Tanzania, a difference of 92,259 kt.

That makes Europe's figure about 12.5 times United Republic of Tanzania's.

Across all 34 years both countries report, Europe has been ahead every year.

Europe ranks 7th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 6th of 33 groups.

Europe has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Europe United Republic of Tanzania Difference Ahead
1990s 71,779 kt 183.68 kt 71,596 kt Europe
2000s 99,924 kt 1,283 kt 98,641 kt Europe
2010s 116,124 kt 4,559 kt 111,566 kt Europe
2020s 100,544 kt 7,870 kt 92,674 kt Europe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher food retail — emissions (co2eq), Europe or United Republic of Tanzania?
Europe, at 100,310 kt against 8,051 kt in United Republic of Tanzania as of 2023.
What is the difference in food retail — emissions (co2eq) between Europe and United Republic of Tanzania?
92,259 kt, with Europe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Europe and United Republic of Tanzania?
34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do Europe and United Republic of Tanzania rank globally for food retail — emissions (co2eq)?
Europe ranks 7th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 6th of 33 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Food Retail — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Europe vs United Republic of Tanzania: Food Retail — Emissions (CO2eq). Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 27 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/food-retail-emissions-co2eq-ar5/europe/united-republic-of-tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/food-retail-emissions-co2eq-ar5/europe/united-republic-of-tanzania/">Europe vs United Republic of Tanzania: Food Retail — Emissions (CO2eq)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Food Retail — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
256 places, 8,441 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Pre- and post- agricultural production includes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, and related activity data, generated from pre- and post-agriculture production stages of the agri-food systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). The domain includes methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O), carbon dioxide (CO2) and CO2 equivalent (CO2eq) emissions from the above activities as well as the aggregate fluorinated gases (F-gases) emissions. Estimates are available by country, with global coverage and are updated annually.The FAOSTAT domain disseminates information estimates of CH4, N2O, CO2 emissions, F-gases, their aggregates in CO2eq in units of kilotonnes (kt, or 10^6 kg), and the underlying activity data. CO2eq emissions are computed by using the IPCC Fifth Assessment report global warming potentials, AR5 (IPCC, 2014). Data are available for most countries and territories, for standard FAOSTAT regional aggregations, and for Annex I and non-Annex I country groups.