Congo vs Tunisia: Food Retail — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4
Food Retail — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 over time
- Congo
- Tunisia
How they compare
Tunisia currently reports 0.7027 kt against 0.6744 kt in Congo, a difference of 0.0283 kt.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 13 shared years of data; in 2011 it was Congo ahead.
Congo ranks 76th and Tunisia ranks 75th of 190 countries.
Congo has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Tunisia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.5169 kt | 0.3877 kt | 0.1292 kt | Congo |
| 2020s | 0.6641 kt | 0.6239 kt | 0.0402 kt | Congo |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher food retail — emissions (co2eq) from ch4, Congo or Tunisia?
- Tunisia, at 0.7027 kt against 0.6744 kt in Congo as of 2023.
- What is the difference in food retail — emissions (co2eq) from ch4 between Congo and Tunisia?
- 0.0283 kt, with Tunisia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Tunisia?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2023.
- How do Congo and Tunisia rank globally for food retail — emissions (co2eq) from ch4?
- Congo ranks 76th and Tunisia ranks 75th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Food Retail — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf