Cuba vs Syria: Food Retail — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4
Food Retail — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 over time
- Cuba
- Syria
How they compare
Cuba currently reports 0.1302 kt against 0.1264 kt in Syria, a difference of 0.0038 kt.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 17 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Syria ahead.
Cuba ranks 142nd and Syria ranks 145th of 222 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Cuba averaged higher in 1 and Syria in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cuba | Syria | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.0649 kt | 0.3209 kt | 0.256 kt | Syria |
| 2010s | 0.1344 kt | 0.1736 kt | 0.0392 kt | Syria |
| 2020s | 0.1393 kt | 0.131 kt | 0.0083 kt | Cuba |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher food retail — emissions (co2eq) from ch4, Cuba or Syria?
- Cuba, at 0.1302 kt against 0.1264 kt in Syria as of 2023.
- What is the difference in food retail — emissions (co2eq) from ch4 between Cuba and Syria?
- 0.0038 kt, with Cuba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Syria?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2023.
- How do Cuba and Syria rank globally for food retail — emissions (co2eq) from ch4?
- Cuba ranks 142nd and Syria ranks 145th of 222 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Food Retail — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf