Cuba vs Syria: Food Retail — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O
Food Retail — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O over time
- Cuba
- Syria
How they compare
Cuba currently reports 0.2531 kt against 0.248 kt in Syria, a difference of 0.0051 kt.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 17 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Syria ahead.
Cuba ranks 142nd and Syria ranks 143rd of 222 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Cuba averaged higher in 1 and Syria in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cuba | Syria | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.1327 kt | 0.6539 kt | 0.5212 kt | Syria |
| 2010s | 0.2651 kt | 0.3434 kt | 0.0783 kt | Syria |
| 2020s | 0.2714 kt | 0.2571 kt | 0.0144 kt | Cuba |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher food retail — emissions (co2eq) from n2o, Cuba or Syria?
- Cuba, at 0.2531 kt against 0.248 kt in Syria as of 2023.
- What is the difference in food retail — emissions (co2eq) from n2o between Cuba and Syria?
- 0.0051 kt, with Cuba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Syria?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2023.
- How do Cuba and Syria rank globally for food retail — emissions (co2eq) from n2o?
- Cuba ranks 142nd and Syria ranks 143rd of 222 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Food Retail — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf