Ecuador vs Ghana: Food Retail — Emissions
Food Retail — Emissions over time
- Ecuador
- Ghana
How they compare
Ecuador currently reports 0.0029 kt against 0.0028 kt in Ghana, a difference of 0.0001 kt.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 28 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Ecuador ahead.
Ecuador ranks 86th and Ghana ranks 88th of 190 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 3 and Ghana in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Ghana | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0009 kt | 0.0008 kt | 0.0002 kt | Ecuador |
| 2000s | 0.0019 kt | 0.0011 kt | 0.0007 kt | Ecuador |
| 2010s | 0.0037 kt | 0.0028 kt | 0.0009 kt | Ecuador |
| 2020s | 0.0027 kt | 0.0032 kt | 0.0005 kt | Ghana |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher food retail — emissions, Ecuador or Ghana?
- Ecuador, at 0.0029 kt against 0.0028 kt in Ghana as of 2023.
- What is the difference in food retail — emissions between Ecuador and Ghana?
- 0.0001 kt, with Ecuador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Ghana?
- 28 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2023.
- How do Ecuador and Ghana rank globally for food retail — emissions?
- Ecuador ranks 86th and Ghana ranks 88th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Food Retail — Emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf