Kenya vs Kyrgyzstan: Food Retail — Emissions
Food Retail — Emissions over time
- Kenya
- Kyrgyzstan
How they compare
Kenya currently reports 0.0015 kt against 0.0015 kt in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 0 kt.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 17 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Kyrgyzstan ahead.
Kenya ranks 105th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 105th of 190 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Kenya averaged higher in 2 and Kyrgyzstan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kenya | Kyrgyzstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.0003 kt | 0.0002 kt | 0.0001 kt | Kenya |
| 2010s | 0.0005 kt | 0.0007 kt | 0.0002 kt | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2020s | 0.0015 kt | 0.0014 kt | 0 kt | Kenya |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher food retail — emissions, Kenya or Kyrgyzstan?
- Kenya, at 0.0015 kt against 0.0015 kt in Kyrgyzstan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in food retail — emissions between Kenya and Kyrgyzstan?
- 0 kt, with Kenya ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kenya and Kyrgyzstan?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2023.
- How do Kenya and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for food retail — emissions?
- Kenya ranks 105th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 105th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Food Retail — Emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf