Croatia vs Uzbekistan: Share of national greenhouse gas emissions that come from food
Croatia
38.2%
in 2015
Uzbekistan
39.1%
in 2015
Croatia rank
115th
Uzbekistan rank
113th
Share of national greenhouse gas emissions that come from food over time
- Croatia
- Uzbekistan
How they compare
Uzbekistan currently reports 39.1% against 38.2% in Croatia, a difference of 0.9%.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Croatia ahead.
Croatia ranks 115th and Uzbekistan ranks 113th of 217 countries.
Croatia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Croatia | Uzbekistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 62.7% | 24.4% | 38.3% | Croatia |
| 2000s | 47.2% | 25.6% | 21.6% | Croatia |
| 2010s | 38.5% | 35.5% | 2.9% | Croatia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher share of national greenhouse gas emissions that come from food, Croatia or Uzbekistan?
- Uzbekistan, at 39.1% against 38.2% in Croatia as of 2015.
- What is the difference in share of national greenhouse gas emissions that come from food between Croatia and Uzbekistan?
- 0.9%, with Uzbekistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and Uzbekistan?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2015.
- How do Croatia and Uzbekistan rank globally for share of national greenhouse gas emissions that come from food?
- Croatia ranks 115th and Uzbekistan ranks 113th of 217 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Crippa et al. (2021) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Share of national greenhouse gas emissions that come from food. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Food system emissions include agriculture, land-use change, and supply chain emissions (transport, packaging, food processing, retail, cooking, and waste). Emissions are quantified based on food production, not consumption. This means they do not account for international trade.