Dominican Republic vs Kiribati: Share of national greenhouse gas emissions that come from food
Dominican Republic
55.0%
in 2015
Kiribati
53.6%
in 2015
Dominican Republic rank
87th
Kiribati rank
89th
Share of national greenhouse gas emissions that come from food over time
- Dominican Republic
- Kiribati
How they compare
Dominican Republic currently reports 55.0% against 53.6% in Kiribati, a difference of 1.4%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Dominican Republic ahead.
Dominican Republic ranks 87th and Kiribati ranks 89th of 217 countries.
Dominican Republic has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Dominican Republic | Kiribati | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 91.9% | 62.2% | 29.7% | Dominican Republic |
| 2000s | 56.2% | 51.6% | 4.6% | Dominican Republic |
| 2010s | 56.6% | 40.3% | 16.3% | Dominican Republic |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher share of national greenhouse gas emissions that come from food, Dominican Republic or Kiribati?
- Dominican Republic, at 55.0% against 53.6% in Kiribati as of 2015.
- What is the difference in share of national greenhouse gas emissions that come from food between Dominican Republic and Kiribati?
- 1.4%, with Dominican Republic ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Dominican Republic and Kiribati?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2015.
- How do Dominican Republic and Kiribati rank globally for share of national greenhouse gas emissions that come from food?
- Dominican Republic ranks 87th and Kiribati ranks 89th of 217 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Crippa et al. (2021) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Share of national greenhouse gas emissions that come from food. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Food system emissions include agriculture, land-use change, and supply chain emissions (transport, packaging, food processing, retail, cooking, and waste). Emissions are quantified based on food production, not consumption. This means they do not account for international trade.