Australia vs Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs): Food Transport — Emissions (CH4)

Australia
1.62 kt
in 2023
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
5.4 kt
in 2023
Australia rank
20th
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) rank
22nd

Food Transport — Emissions (CH4) over time

  • Australia
  • Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
0246199020062023

How they compare

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) currently reports 5.4 kt against 1.62 kt in Australia, a difference of 3.78 kt.

That makes Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)'s figure about 3.3 times Australia's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Australia ahead.

Australia ranks 20th and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 22nd of 233 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Australia averaged higher in 2 and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) Difference Ahead
1990s 1.98 kt 0.9673 kt 1.01 kt Australia
2000s 2.28 kt 1.39 kt 0.8869 kt Australia
2010s 2.15 kt 3.18 kt 1.03 kt Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
2020s 1.68 kt 5.06 kt 3.38 kt Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher food transport — emissions, Australia or Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)?
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs), at 5.4 kt against 1.62 kt in Australia as of 2023.
What is the difference in food transport — emissions between Australia and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)?
3.78 kt, with Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)?
34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do Australia and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) rank globally for food transport — emissions?
Australia ranks 20th and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 22nd of 233 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Food Transport — Emissions (CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs): Food Transport — Emissions. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 15 November 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/food-transport-emissions-ch4/australia/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/food-transport-emissions-ch4/australia/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/">Australia vs Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs): Food Transport — Emissions</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Food Transport — Emissions (CH4)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
267 places, 8,686 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain Emissions from Pre- and Post-Agricultural Production provides estimates of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and related activity data associated with pre- and post-production stages of agrifood systems. The domain includes methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O), carbon dioxide (CO2), fluorinated gases (F-gases) and their aggregates expressed in carbon dioxide equivalent (CO2eq). Estimates are computed following Tier 1 methods of the IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014) and are disseminated annually.