Brunei vs Congo: Food Transport — Emissions
Food Transport — Emissions over time
- Brunei
- Congo
How they compare
Congo currently reports 133.55 kt against 130.16 kt in Brunei, a difference of 3.39 kt.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Brunei ahead.
Brunei ranks 160th and Congo ranks 159th of 240 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Brunei averaged higher in 2 and Congo in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brunei | Congo | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 83.55 kt | 31.58 kt | 51.97 kt | Brunei |
| 2000s | 108.1 kt | 76.44 kt | 31.66 kt | Brunei |
| 2010s | 143.59 kt | 169.76 kt | 26.18 kt | Congo |
| 2020s | 129.23 kt | 132.05 kt | 2.83 kt | Congo |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher food transport — emissions, Brunei or Congo?
- Congo, at 133.55 kt against 130.16 kt in Brunei as of 2023.
- What is the difference in food transport — emissions between Brunei and Congo?
- 3.39 kt, with Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brunei and Congo?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
- How do Brunei and Congo rank globally for food transport — emissions?
- Brunei ranks 160th and Congo ranks 159th of 240 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Food Transport — Emissions (CO2). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf