Afghanistan, Islamic Republic of vs Lithuania: Food Transport β€” Emissions

Afghanistan, Islamic Republic of
480.24 kt
in 2023
Lithuania
476.74 kt
in 2023
Afghanistan, Islamic Republic of rank
91st
Lithuania rank
93rd

Food Transport β€” Emissions over time

  • Afghanistan, Islamic Republic of
  • Lithuania
0100200300400500199020062023

How they compare

Afghanistan, Islamic Republic of currently reports 480.24 kt against 476.74 kt in Lithuania, a difference of 3.5 kt.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Lithuania ahead.

Afghanistan, Islamic Republic of ranks 91st and Lithuania ranks 93rd of 208 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Afghanistan, Islamic Republic of averaged higher in 2 and Lithuania in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Afghanistan, Islamic Republic of Lithuania Difference Ahead
1990s 49.89 kt 267.77 kt 217.89 kt Lithuania
2000s 110.54 kt 313.12 kt 202.59 kt Lithuania
2010s 408.6 kt 397.95 kt 10.65 kt Afghanistan, Islamic Republic of
2020s 494.36 kt 483.67 kt 10.68 kt Afghanistan, Islamic Republic of

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher food transport β€” emissions, Afghanistan, Islamic Republic of or Lithuania?
Afghanistan, Islamic Republic of, at 480.24 kt against 476.74 kt in Lithuania as of 2023.
What is the difference in food transport β€” emissions between Afghanistan, Islamic Republic of and Lithuania?
3.5 kt, with Afghanistan, Islamic Republic of ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Afghanistan, Islamic Republic of and Lithuania?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Afghanistan, Islamic Republic of and Lithuania rank globally for food transport β€” emissions?
Afghanistan, Islamic Republic of ranks 91st and Lithuania ranks 93rd of 208 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Food Transport β€” Emissions (CO2). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Afghanistan, Islamic Republic of vs Lithuania: Food Transport β€” Emissions. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 18 August 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/food-transport-emissions-co2/afghanistan/lithuania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/food-transport-emissions-co2/afghanistan/lithuania/">Afghanistan, Islamic Republic of vs Lithuania: Food Transport β€” Emissions</a> β€” Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Food Transport β€” Emissions (CO2)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
267 places, 8,686 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Pre- and post- agricultural production includes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, and related activity data, generated from pre- and post-agriculture production stages of the agri-food systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). The domain includes methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O), carbon dioxide (CO2) and CO2 equivalent (CO2eq) emissions from the above activities as well as the aggregate fluorinated gases (F-gases) emissions. Estimates are available by country, with global coverage and are updated annually.The FAOSTAT domain disseminates information estimates of CH4, N2O, CO2 emissions, F-gases, their aggregates in CO2eq in units of kilotonnes (kt, or 10^6 kg), and the underlying activity data. CO2eq emissions are computed by using the IPCC Fifth Assessment report global warming potentials, AR5 (IPCC, 2014). Data are available for most countries and territories, for standard FAOSTAT regional aggregations, and for Annex I and non-Annex I country groups.