Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha vs Monaco: Food Transport — Emissions (CO2eq)

Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha
0.5526 kt
in 2023
Monaco
0.2022 kt
in 2023
Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha rank
201st
Monaco rank
204th

Food Transport — Emissions (CO2eq) over time

  • Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha
  • Monaco
00.250.50.751199020062023

How they compare

Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha currently reports 0.5526 kt against 0.2022 kt in Monaco, a difference of 0.3504 kt.

That makes Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha's figure about 2.7 times Monaco's.

Across all 34 years both countries report, Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha has been ahead every year.

Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha ranks 201st and Monaco ranks 204th of 211 countries.

Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha Monaco Difference Ahead
1990s 0.492 kt 0.0259 kt 0.4661 kt Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha
2000s 0.4244 kt 0.1367 kt 0.2878 kt Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha
2010s 0.6518 kt 0.2012 kt 0.4507 kt Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha
2020s 0.5613 kt 0.2022 kt 0.359 kt Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher food transport — emissions (co2eq), Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha or Monaco?
Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha, at 0.5526 kt against 0.2022 kt in Monaco as of 2023.
What is the difference in food transport — emissions (co2eq) between Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha and Monaco?
0.3504 kt, with Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha and Monaco?
34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha and Monaco rank globally for food transport — emissions (co2eq)?
Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha ranks 201st and Monaco ranks 204th of 211 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Food Transport — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha vs Monaco: Food Transport — Emissions (CO2eq). Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/food-transport-emissions-co2eq-ar5-fao-tier-1/ascension-saint-helena-and-tristan-da-cunha/monaco/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/food-transport-emissions-co2eq-ar5-fao-tier-1/ascension-saint-helena-and-tristan-da-cunha/monaco/">Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha vs Monaco: Food Transport — Emissions (CO2eq)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Food Transport — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
264 places, 8,776 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf