Belarus vs Serbia: Food Transport — Emissions (CO2eq)
Food Transport — Emissions (CO2eq) over time
- Belarus
- Serbia
How they compare
Belarus currently reports 1,126 kt against 1,120 kt in Serbia, a difference of 6 kt.
Across all 18 years both countries report, Belarus has been ahead every year.
Belarus ranks 64th and Serbia ranks 65th of 211 countries.
Belarus has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1,072 kt | 848.3 kt | 223.87 kt | Belarus |
| 2010s | 1,238 kt | 866.16 kt | 371.37 kt | Belarus |
| 2020s | 1,151 kt | 1,063 kt | 87.66 kt | Belarus |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher food transport — emissions (co2eq), Belarus or Serbia?
- Belarus, at 1,126 kt against 1,120 kt in Serbia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in food transport — emissions (co2eq) between Belarus and Serbia?
- 6 kt, with Belarus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Serbia?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
- How do Belarus and Serbia rank globally for food transport — emissions (co2eq)?
- Belarus ranks 64th and Serbia ranks 65th of 211 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Food Transport — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf