Belgium vs Libya: Food Transport — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5)
Food Transport — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) over time
- Belgium
- Libya
How they compare
Libya currently reports 1,977 kt against 1,966 kt in Belgium, a difference of 11 kt.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Belgium ahead.
Belgium ranks 52nd and Libya ranks 50th of 244 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Belgium averaged higher in 2 and Libya in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belgium | Libya | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2,003 kt | 1,304 kt | 698.85 kt | Belgium |
| 2010s | 2,032 kt | 1,910 kt | 122.31 kt | Belgium |
| 2020s | 1,909 kt | 1,933 kt | 24.33 kt | Libya |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher food transport — emissions (co2eq), Belgium or Libya?
- Libya, at 1,977 kt against 1,966 kt in Belgium as of 2023.
- What is the difference in food transport — emissions (co2eq) between Belgium and Libya?
- 11 kt, with Libya ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Libya?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Belgium and Libya rank globally for food transport — emissions (co2eq)?
- Belgium ranks 52nd and Libya ranks 50th of 244 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Food Transport — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf