Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) vs United Kingdom: Food Transport — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5)

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
16,288 kt
in 2023
United Kingdom
9,307 kt
in 2023
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) rank
23rd
United Kingdom rank
22nd

Food Transport — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) over time

  • Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
  • United Kingdom
05.0k10.0k15.0k199020062023

How they compare

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) currently reports 16,288 kt against 9,307 kt in United Kingdom, a difference of 6,981 kt.

That makes Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)'s figure about 1.8 times United Kingdom's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was United Kingdom ahead.

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 23rd and United Kingdom ranks 22nd of 33 groups.

Across the 4 decades both report, Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) averaged higher in 2 and United Kingdom in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) United Kingdom Difference Ahead
1990s 4,189 kt 9,477 kt 5,288 kt United Kingdom
2000s 5,858 kt 9,805 kt 3,947 kt United Kingdom
2010s 10,893 kt 9,822 kt 1,070 kt Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
2020s 15,093 kt 8,954 kt 6,140 kt Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher food transport — emissions (co2eq), Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) or United Kingdom?
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs), at 16,288 kt against 9,307 kt in United Kingdom as of 2023.
What is the difference in food transport — emissions (co2eq) between Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and United Kingdom?
6,981 kt, with Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and United Kingdom?
34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and United Kingdom rank globally for food transport — emissions (co2eq)?
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 23rd and United Kingdom ranks 22nd of 33 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Food Transport — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) vs United Kingdom: Food Transport — Emissions (CO2eq). Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/food-transport-emissions-co2eq-ar5-fao-tier-1/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/united-kingdom/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/food-transport-emissions-co2eq-ar5-fao-tier-1/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/united-kingdom/">Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) vs United Kingdom: Food Transport — Emissions (CO2eq)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Food Transport — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
277 places, 9,214 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf