Bhutan vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Food Transport — Emissions (CO2eq)

Bhutan
19.61 kt
in 2023
Turks and Caicos Islands
16.5 kt
in 2023
Bhutan rank
180th
Turks and Caicos Islands rank
182nd

Food Transport — Emissions (CO2eq) over time

  • Bhutan
  • Turks and Caicos Islands
05101520199020062023

How they compare

Bhutan currently reports 19.61 kt against 16.5 kt in Turks and Caicos Islands, a difference of 3.11 kt.

That makes Bhutan's figure about 1.2 times Turks and Caicos Islands's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Turks and Caicos Islands ahead.

Bhutan ranks 180th and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 182nd of 217 countries.

Turks and Caicos Islands has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bhutan Turks and Caicos Islands Difference Ahead
1990s 1.65 kt 4.15 kt 2.5 kt Turks and Caicos Islands
2000s 3.62 kt 8.99 kt 5.37 kt Turks and Caicos Islands
2010s 9.06 kt 14.27 kt 5.21 kt Turks and Caicos Islands
2020s 12.56 kt 16.33 kt 3.78 kt Turks and Caicos Islands

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher food transport — emissions (co2eq), Bhutan or Turks and Caicos Islands?
Bhutan, at 19.61 kt against 16.5 kt in Turks and Caicos Islands as of 2023.
What is the difference in food transport — emissions (co2eq) between Bhutan and Turks and Caicos Islands?
3.11 kt, with Bhutan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bhutan and Turks and Caicos Islands?
34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do Bhutan and Turks and Caicos Islands rank globally for food transport — emissions (co2eq)?
Bhutan ranks 180th and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 182nd of 217 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Food Transport — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bhutan vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Food Transport — Emissions (CO2eq). Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/food-transport-emissions-co2eq-ar5/bhutan/turks-and-caicos-islands/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/food-transport-emissions-co2eq-ar5/bhutan/turks-and-caicos-islands/">Bhutan vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Food Transport — Emissions (CO2eq)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Food Transport — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
271 places, 8,821 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Pre- and post- agricultural production includes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, and related activity data, generated from pre- and post-agriculture production stages of the agri-food systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). The domain includes methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O), carbon dioxide (CO2) and CO2 equivalent (CO2eq) emissions from the above activities as well as the aggregate fluorinated gases (F-gases) emissions. Estimates are available by country, with global coverage and are updated annually.The FAOSTAT domain disseminates information estimates of CH4, N2O, CO2 emissions, F-gases, their aggregates in CO2eq in units of kilotonnes (kt, or 10^6 kg), and the underlying activity data. CO2eq emissions are computed by using the IPCC Fifth Assessment report global warming potentials, AR5 (IPCC, 2014). Data are available for most countries and territories, for standard FAOSTAT regional aggregations, and for Annex I and non-Annex I country groups.