Australia and New Zealand vs Congo: Forest fires — Burned Area

Australia and New Zealand
126,361 ha
in 2024
Congo
165,085 ha
in 2024
Australia and New Zealand rank
20th
Congo rank
18th

Forest fires — Burned Area over time

  • Australia and New Zealand
  • Congo
01.0M2.0M3.0M199020072024

How they compare

Congo currently reports 165,085 ha against 126,361 ha in Australia and New Zealand, a difference of 38,724 ha.

That makes Congo's figure about 1.3 times Australia and New Zealand's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Australia and New Zealand ahead.

Australia and New Zealand ranks 20th and Congo ranks 18th of 219 countries.

Australia and New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia and New Zealand Congo Difference Ahead
1990s 605,507 ha 44,958 ha 560,549 ha Australia and New Zealand
2000s 492,137 ha 42,700 ha 449,436 ha Australia and New Zealand
2010s 578,427 ha 57,390 ha 521,038 ha Australia and New Zealand
2020s 445,343 ha 76,984 ha 368,359 ha Australia and New Zealand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher forest fires — burned area, Australia and New Zealand or Congo?
Congo, at 165,085 ha against 126,361 ha in Australia and New Zealand as of 2024.
What is the difference in forest fires — burned area between Australia and New Zealand and Congo?
38,724 ha, with Congo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and Congo?
35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
How do Australia and New Zealand and Congo rank globally for forest fires — burned area?
Australia and New Zealand ranks 20th and Congo ranks 18th of 219 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Forest fires — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia and New Zealand vs Congo: Forest fires — Burned Area. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 27 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/forest-fires-burned-area-fao-tier-1/australia-and-new-zealand/congo-rep/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/forest-fires-burned-area-fao-tier-1/australia-and-new-zealand/congo-rep/">Australia and New Zealand vs Congo: Forest fires — Burned Area</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Forest fires — Burned Area
Unit
ha
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
272 places, 9,294 data points, 1990–2024
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.