Australia and New Zealand vs Ethiopia: Forest fires — Burned Area

Australia and New Zealand
126,361 ha
in 2024
Ethiopia
140,455 ha
in 2024
Australia and New Zealand rank
20th
Ethiopia rank
19th

Forest fires — Burned Area over time

  • Australia and New Zealand
  • Ethiopia
01.0M2.0M3.0M199020072024

How they compare

Ethiopia currently reports 140,455 ha against 126,361 ha in Australia and New Zealand, a difference of 14,094 ha.

That makes Ethiopia's figure about 1.1 times Australia and New Zealand's.

The two have swapped places 9 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Australia and New Zealand ahead.

Australia and New Zealand ranks 20th and Ethiopia ranks 19th of 219 countries.

Australia and New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia and New Zealand Ethiopia Difference Ahead
1990s 632,510 ha 196,668 ha 435,842 ha Australia and New Zealand
2000s 492,137 ha 210,009 ha 282,128 ha Australia and New Zealand
2010s 578,427 ha 168,800 ha 409,628 ha Australia and New Zealand
2020s 445,343 ha 188,791 ha 256,552 ha Australia and New Zealand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher forest fires — burned area, Australia and New Zealand or Ethiopia?
Ethiopia, at 140,455 ha against 126,361 ha in Australia and New Zealand as of 2024.
What is the difference in forest fires — burned area between Australia and New Zealand and Ethiopia?
14,094 ha, with Ethiopia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and Ethiopia?
32 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2024.
How do Australia and New Zealand and Ethiopia rank globally for forest fires — burned area?
Australia and New Zealand ranks 20th and Ethiopia ranks 19th of 219 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Forest fires — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia and New Zealand vs Ethiopia: Forest fires — Burned Area. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/forest-fires-burned-area-fao-tier-1/australia-and-new-zealand/ethiopia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/forest-fires-burned-area-fao-tier-1/australia-and-new-zealand/ethiopia/">Australia and New Zealand vs Ethiopia: Forest fires — Burned Area</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Forest fires — Burned Area
Unit
ha
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
272 places, 9,294 data points, 1990–2024
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.