Bahamas vs Eswatini: Forest fires — Burned Area
Bahamas
4,241 ha
in 2024
Eswatini
3,578 ha
in 2024
Bahamas rank
58th
Eswatini rank
59th
Forest fires — Burned Area over time
- Bahamas
- Eswatini
How they compare
Bahamas currently reports 4,241 ha against 3,578 ha in Eswatini, a difference of 663 ha.
That makes Bahamas's figure about 1.2 times Eswatini's.
The two have swapped places 20 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Bahamas ahead.
Bahamas ranks 58th and Eswatini ranks 59th of 219 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Bahamas averaged higher in 3 and Eswatini in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bahamas | Eswatini | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 6,351 ha | 6,314 ha | 36.88 ha | Bahamas |
| 2000s | 4,998 ha | 6,497 ha | 1,498 ha | Eswatini |
| 2010s | 5,906 ha | 4,107 ha | 1,799 ha | Bahamas |
| 2020s | 2,905 ha | 1,976 ha | 929.29 ha | Bahamas |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher forest fires — burned area, Bahamas or Eswatini?
- Bahamas, at 4,241 ha against 3,578 ha in Eswatini as of 2024.
- What is the difference in forest fires — burned area between Bahamas and Eswatini?
- 663 ha, with Bahamas ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bahamas and Eswatini?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Bahamas and Eswatini rank globally for forest fires — burned area?
- Bahamas ranks 58th and Eswatini ranks 59th of 219 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Forest fires — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.